Company wrongly shown issued capital as Rs.84 cr instead of Rs.100 cr. in violation of Sec.211 of CA 1956. Co. contended that the default did not cause any prejudice to members, creditors and no harm was caused to public interest. NCLT however refused to compound the offence:
http://nclt.c2k.in/OtherNCLT/Publication/Hyderabad_Bench/2017/Other/JellaJaganN.pdf
With Regards
Prakash Verma
| The current webpage lists the periodic updates done in the comprehensive e-filing module for Patents: |
| Name | Update | Release Date |
| Petition u/r 128 | Addition of Rule 128 in "On petition not otherwise provided for" | 2017-06-21 |
| Segregation of different Petitions under Form 30 | Seperate entries of Petition in Entry no. 46 (Schedule 1) | 2017-06-21 |
| Request for Withdrawal U/R 11A(3)(c) | New entry provided in Form 30 (without fee) | 2017-06-19 |
| Filing of Response to office action | New entry has been provided in Form 30 (both with fee as well as without fee) | 2017-06-14 |
| Issues with respect to type of applicant (NP/ONP/SE/SU) in fee calculation | Provision of selection of type of applicant has been provided in form 18, form 18A, Renewal of patent, form 9 and transmittal fee | 2017-06-12 |
| Conversion of CS to PS under section 9(3) | New entry provided in Form 30 (without fee) | 2017-06-07 |
| Request for Hearing U/R 84(2) | New entry provided in Form 30 (without fee) | 2017-05-29 |
| Notify the Controller whether he will attend the hearing U/R28(4) | New entry provided in Form 30 (without fee) | 2017-05-29 |
